Newsback
REGISTER NOW and be a part of the Community!
news   forums   blogs   reviews   marketplace   marketplace
news  
news section  
National
Tuesday, November 29, 2005 WASHINGTON —...
Technology
For the fourth time,...
Business
Asian shares, bonds and currencies went into a...
World News
Doha is dead, long live Doha. The last-minute...

newsletter
Subscribe to the Newsback Newsletter and get site news as well as exclusive and special features!
Enter your Email:







Go Back   Newsback > News > Science
Reload this Page U.N.'s Burdensome Rules Continue to Defy Science

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

  #1  
  Old 11-28-2005, 08:35 PM
U.N.'s Burdensome Rules Continue to Defy Science
HenryMiller HenryMiller is offline
Writer
Trader Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 175 | Points: 488.00 (Donate)
Hartwig de Haen's letter ("Agency Seeks to Form World Food Standards," Nov. 14) unwittingly illustrates my point -- namely, the unscientific approach and lack of rigor of United Nations' institutions, programs and senior officials. Without offering a shred of evidence to bolster his assertions, he assures us that the U.N. is committed "to the contribution of biotechnology to eradicating world hunger," and to "developing standards for foods on the basis of scientific evidence and risk analysis."

The facts argue otherwise.

Like trying to build a bridge or an airplane using the incorrect value of the Greek letter "pi," when the basic assumptions that underlie a project are flawed, everything that follows is distorted. A long-standing scientific consensus and 30 years of experiments confirm that gene-splicing technology and its products are not, in fact, distinct categories amenable to generalization; gene-splicing techniques are essentially an extension, or refinement, of earlier, less precise, less predictable techniques to accomplish genetic improvement -- not unlike the improvement of automobiles' performance and safety with radial tires and disk brakes.

But the U.N.'s deliberations -- including those under the imprimatur of Codex (a creature of WHO and FAO) -- continue to defy science by devising burdensome new regulatory requirements and procedures that apply only to the pseudo-category of foods from gene-spliced organisms. This turns the logic of regulation on its head: In the U.N.'s distorted world of regulatory oversight, there is an inverse relationship between degree of regulation and risk. The result is vastly inflated R&D costs and diminished diffusion of superior techniques and products -- especially to poorer countries, which need them desperately.

It is easy to declare support for the U.N.'s Millennium Development Goals. What's harder is to resist activists' placing anti-scientific, politically motivated obstacles in the way of meeting them. At this, the U.N. and Mr. de Haen are failing miserably.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  un_biotech.jpg
Views: 2101
Size:  82.1 KB  

Last edited by HenryMiller : 11-28-2005 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Science of Superstitions samvaknin Opinions 0 12-02-2005 12:01 PM
Is Psychology a Science? samvaknin Opinions 0 12-02-2005 11:59 AM


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2007 Newsback.com

Bad Credit Loan | vBulletin | Mortgage Calculator | Virgin Wallpaper | Mobile Phone deals| Internet Marketing