Newsback
REGISTER NOW and be a part of the Community!
news   forums   blogs   reviews   marketplace   marketplace
news  
news section  
World News
The bodies of two U.S. soldiers reported captured...
National
Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:43 PM ET By Ellen...
Sports
For one great hole, Phil Mickelson went back in...
World News
Medical assistance worth will be provided $10...
Politics
First, Democrats trump Republicans in the...

newsletter
Subscribe to the Newsback Newsletter and get site news as well as exclusive and special features!
Enter your Email:






Congressman Freaks Out About Second Life; Demands Ban In Schools
by TechDirt (Posted 05-09-2008 06:55 AM) [View Discussion | Join Discussion | Rate Thread ]

Just a few months after worrying about terrorists hiding in Second Life, now at least one Congressional representative is worried about how Second Life is corrupting your children. He's trying to drum up support to ban Second Life from schools and libraries, hyping up the fact that "bad stuff" happens in Second Life and, gosh, we wouldn't want kids to learn how to deal with bad stuff in an environment where they're protected from any physical harm. It'll be much better when they learn to deal with it out on the streets.

This is actually an attempt by Rep. Mark Kirk to reintroduce DOPA, the Deleting Online Predators Act. It was last introduced almost exactly two years ago (note the timing: right before Congressional election season...). Because very few politicians want to give an opening to challengers to their seats to put out an ad saying they voted against "protecting the children" last time around the law was quickly approved by the House by a massive 410 to 15 vote, at which point it moved on to the Senate to die (not having all Senators up for re-election at the same time has its benefits). Of the 15 dissenters to the original bill, Rep. John Dingell was the one who said what needed to be said (and which so few other Reps were willing to say):

"So now we are on the floor with a piece of legislation poorly thought out, with an abundance of surprises, which carries with it that curious smell of partisanship and panic, but which is not going to address the problems. This is a piece of legislation which is going to be notorious for its ineffectiveness and, of course, for its political benefits to some of the members hereabout."

Yes, the law would effectively ban a ton of internet sites from schools and libraries, including ones like LinkedIn, Slashdot and Amazon.com, based on its overly broad language. On top of all that, study after study after study has shown that social networks and virtual worlds (despite the FUD) are not "breeding grounds" for predators. And, of course, parents are finally coming to terms with this and are no longer freaking out about kids using these sites. So, explain why we need such unnecessary and overly broad legislation again? Oh right, it's election season...

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story







Read the full story here.


Show Printable Version Email this Page

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Life, Liberty and Freedom JB Williams Opinions 0 09-25-2007 06:23 AM
Congressman Tom Tancredo: Standing Out From the Fray Felicia Benamon Opinions 0 05-18-2006 04:39 AM
Suicide - The Murder of Oneself samvaknin Opinions 0 01-19-2006 12:21 PM
Euthanasia and the Right to Die samvaknin Health & Fitness 0 11-12-2005 01:27 PM
Abortion And the Right to Life samvaknin Opinions 0 11-01-2005 12:16 PM


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2007 Newsback.com

Online advertising | Image Hosting | TurboTax | Mortgage Calculator | Homeowner Loans| Internet Marketing