Serious Questions that the Press Refuse to Ask! - It is very troubling that a man is seeking the office of Commander-in-Chief of the United States at a time when he will confront lethal threats against the nation from the most brutal tyrants around the globe, yet he is openly afraid to face the unfriendly news reporters at FOX News Network...

He thinks he can handle Al Qaeda, Hamas, Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Kim Jon Il and Russian aggression, but admittedly can’t handle Bill O’Reilly?

Even Hillary Clinton was brave enough to sit and field open questions from FOX News, which she did very well by the way. I’m a conservative, so I’m not a Hillary supporter. But I must say that Hillary handled herself quite well in FOX interviews, a room Obama won’t even set foot in. Obama is the only candidate in history who has refused to answer FOX News questions.

Are we really going to elect a war time president who is afraid of FOX News?

What is Obama so afraid of?

The answer to this question is obvious. FOX might be the only news service in America that would dare to ask Obama the most important questions surrounding his quest for the highest office in our land. Every news service should be asking these questions, but clearly no other news room is going to ask anything that might upset Obama’s apple cart.

My most recent column, Exactly How Biased is the American Media? spelled out the cold hard facts of just how left-wing the modern American media really is today. Most Americans correctly assess the American media as “in the bag for Obama.” But few Americans have any idea of the depth to which their suspicions are right, or what Obama stories lurk that would likely derail his campaign if the press would ever confront the candidate with those stories…

Questions any candidate should have to answer!

Feeling the walls closing in on his empty résumé after a horrific performance at the Saddleback debate last week, Obama held the press captive all week long awaiting his hi-tech announcement of a VP running mate. It should shock no one that Obama settled on career left-wing attack dog Joe Biden, who would immediately assume the task of attacking all who might attack Obama, leaving Obama above the fray and far from confronting his demons.

So far, the press is following their DNC marching orders and focusing all attention on Biden as if he were the one seeking the Oval Office. The ploy worked and Obama has bought more time, kicking the can down the road far enough to skate through the DNC convention without having to confront any of the stories or questions that could make him an easy target for a Clinton Coup on the convention floor. ( http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/gu...jbw_08201.shtml )

But any presidential candidate should have to face the press on some of the most damning stories to ever surround a presidential wannabe.

Real Stories ignored by the Obama-Press

* Obama's Lost Annenberg Years Coming to Light – And so is the current cover-up effort to bury this story. ( http://www.americanthinker.com/2008...g_years_co.html )
* Lawsuit - Obama NOT US Citizen – This suit was filed 8/21/08, only days before the DNC convention, by Pennsylvania former Assistant AG and Clinton supporter, Philip J. Berg, Esquire. Download this file (ObamaComplaint.pdf: http://www.obamacrimes.com/attachme...maComplaint.pdf )Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief (
* Obama’s Muslim heritage - Candidate Obama has repeatedly denounced his Muslim heritage, but his own books say something quite different. He hinges his Christian heritage on his membership to the Rev. Wright’s racially charged anti-American church, which he also denounces now. He now says his mother was a Kansas Christian, but she was actually a devoted atheist and his father’s were all Muslim. ( http://www.americanthinker.com/2008..._offlimits.html )
* Obama’s Communist Connections – The Communist Party USA, Socialist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America support Obama’s campaign. Obama’s father and mother were communist activists. His life heroes are Weatherman William Ayers and communist Saul Alinsky. Research the communist practice “community organizing,” Obama’s leadership claim to fame. ( http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/ )
* Obama’s connection to his African cousin Odinga - and the thousands murdered in pursuit of socialist power in Africa. Part II ( http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2662 )
* Obama's Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes ( http://www.americanthinker.com/2008...utions_sil.html )
* Obama crime connections ( http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ne...icle3486054.ece )

These are just the top stories that present very real and valid questions. The press would happily use any one of them to destroy almost any other politician. The collective list would be impossible to ignore by any honest journalist. But all of these stories have been buried by the Main Stream press for months now.

Will Obama be allowed to waltz into the White House without ever being directly confronted on any of these very real concerns about his fitness or eligibility for the highest office in the land?

If it is up to the lamestream press, Obama will become our next president without ever having to answer any of these serious charges.

Are American voters going to sit on their hands and allow their press to bury all of it in support of their chosen Messiah?

Best I can tell, Barack Obama is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated upon American voters and the press is going to continue providing aid and comfort to his efforts to defraud American voters.

In an ideal world with a truly honest, fair and balanced press, all of these questions would have already been asked and answered. But they have never been asked and unless the American people demand that they are asked, they will never be fully answered.

If Obama has nothing to hide, why is he hiding?

If the press has nothing to cover-up, why are they providing cover by not asking the questions?

I don’t care what political party you belong to. If you are willing to elect a president surrounded by so many allegations without even asking the questions, you are NO American!

If Obama has a good answer for all of these allegations, I want to hear them. But he will never answer any of them without being asked. Send a copy of this column to your legislators and media contacts and demand that American voters get straight answers to these questions before this guy becomes the DNC nominee. Once he’s the nominee, if this stuff goes mass media, it will not only destroy his campaign, but the party who helped him hide from the truth as well…

Even Obama supporters should want the answers to these questions before their party is backed into a corner after the convention…

Send it everywhere today and demand answers, before it’s too late to ask!

UPDATE

Almost immediately upon release of this column, I was contacted by leadership members of the Socialist Party USA, Matt Erard – National Ballot Access Director, SP 2008 Presidential Campaign and David Schaich - Socialist Party Campaign Clearinghouse Coordinator, concerning this statement in my column…

“The Communist Party USA, Socialist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America support Obama’s campaign.”

Both Mr. Erard and Mr. Schaich denied that there was any connection between their party and the Obama campaign. In the interest of truth, I contacted David Schaich and requested the official position of the Socialist Party USA regarding the Obama campaign.

While the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America have officially “endorsed” and support the Obama campaign, it appears that the Socialist Party USA has instead endorsed their own candidates, Brian Moore of Florida for president and Stewart Alexander of California for vice-president.

In response to my request for specific party positions, Mr. Schaich wrote;

“I have not heard of a single Socialist Party member who supports the Obama campaign, and such support would be in violation of the Socialist Party Constitution, which states (Article VI, Section 2) that Socialist Party members may support candidates of other political parties only in the absence of a Socialist Party candidate. Since the Socialist Party has a Presidential ticket, any members who support other presidential campaigns are doing so without our sanction and in violation of our constitution.

The Socialist Party is completely independent of the Democratic Party, and does not support it or its candidates, including Barack Obama.

Complete independence from the Democratic Party is a central element of the Socialist Party's identity and principles (http://socialistparty-usa.org/principles.html). You may be aware that
in the 1960s and 1970s, a significant portion of the Socialist Party advocated operating within the Democratic Party. In 1972-1973, those groups formed two separate organizations to pursue that program –

Social Democrats USA, which is now defunct, and Democratic Socialists of America, which operates to some extent as a socialist caucus within the Democratic Party. Those who remained in the Socialist Party were opposed to that strategy, and dedicated to restoring the Socialist Party to full independence from the Democratic Party.”

David

Since it is clear that socialists and communists indeed support the Obama campaign and more importantly, the ideas represented by that campaign, I remain firmly committed to the intent of my statement above.

However, on the basis of the information provided by David Schaich - Socialist Party Campaign Clearinghouse Coordinator, I am retracting the statement which might be interpreted to mean that the Socialist Party USA “endorses” or officially “supports” the Obama campaign.

It was never my intent to mis-state the facts. Even though it is a fact that socialists and communists support Obama for president because he represents much of their agenda, I am willing to accept “as fact” the statement from Mr. Schaich which clearly indicates that his party neither “endorses” nor in any way “supports” the Obama campaign.

It is not possible to know how many members of the Socialist Party USA might in the end, support the Obama campaign. A simple comparison of the platform positions of socialists, communists, today’s DNC and the Obama campaign, will demonstrate beyond any doubt that these groups indeed pursue the same agenda, even when not directly working together.

However, Mr. Schaich made another private point which is quite valid…

“As I'm sure you are aware, a number of individual Republicans support Obama -- http://www.republicansforobama.org , http://gop.barackobama.com -- but it would be ridiculous to say that the Republican Party supports the Obama campaign.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

JB Williams is a political writer and the owner/author of JB-Williams.com.