Pardon me, Russ, but are we talking about the same news item? Simply reporting the fact that someone got married is small news. The fact that, in this case, the person getting married was at the center of a controversy regarding his now-deceased wife is big news.
Much of the media coverage surrounding the original story revolved around speculation regarding Mr. Shaivo's motives, including the fact that he had become romantically involved with another woman. He has now married that women. Reporting on that fact is not making a value judgement. Readers can make that decision for themselves.
Are you saying that once a court makes a ruling, a subject is now history and no longer worthy of press coverage? Or should the media blackout rule apply only if YOU happen to agree with the court's decision?
Please help us understand why this news item, which was reported in the mainstream media, is not fit for inclusion on a free-thinker's site such as Newsback? Surely you have reasons for making these kinds of comments beyond your own personal viewpoints? Readers might be interested in knowing why you feel the way you do.