Newsback
REGISTER NOW and be a part of the Community!
news   forums   blogs   reviews   marketplace   marketplace
news  
news section  
People
After several years on the lam, the man who...
Business
Euro shares ended lower on Friday but U.S. data...
Technology
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. will start selling...
Sports
[b][i](Part 1 of 2)[/i][/b] What started as an...

newsletter
Subscribe to the Newsback Newsletter and get site news as well as exclusive and special features!
Enter your Email:






Humans May be Off the Hook for Some Ancient Extinctions
by Worldsci (Posted 05-16-2006 10:41 AM) [View Discussion | Join Discussion | Rate Thread ]

Click image for larger version

Name:  mammoth-lbl.jpg
Views: 1188
Size:  35.7 KB
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
New evidence has come to light in one of prehistory’s greatest “whodunnit” stories—a spate of animal extinctions more than 10,000 years ago.

Overhunting by humans in North America has been proposed as a possible reason for the die-off, which wiped out species such as the mammoth and the wild horse Equus ferus.

But new dating of more than 600 animal bones suggests that other factors, such as natural climate shifts, were to blame, according to R. Dale Guthrie of the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, Alaska.

Data provided by Guthrie in this week’s issue of the research journal Nature gave what he argued is a more precise account of the sequence of events surrounding the mass extinction.

Guthrie employed radiocarbon dating, a chemical analysis used to determine the age of organic materials based on their content of the radioactive element Carbon-14. He wrote that he was able to obtain more samples than past researchers had used, and in this way to identify “previously unrecognized patterns” in the data.

The extinctions occurred during a period known as the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, from 13,000 to 10,000 years ago. The dated samples included bones from bison, wapiti, moose and humans, all of which survived the period, together with horse and mammoth, which did not.

The evidence suggests climate shifts or more subtle mechanisms were behind the die-offs, Guthrie argued—not a “blitzkrieg” of hunting by humans, who were newly arrived in the New World.

Guthrie also said his data contradicts the “keystone removal” hypothesis, which suggested that killing off of grazing mammoths by humans led to changes in vegetation that caused a domino-effect extinction of other beasts.

       ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Science writer Jack Lucentini is founder and editor of the World Science science news webzine. He has worked as a staff writer at three daily newspapers, and as a freelance science writer for a range of publications including The Washington Post, Discover magazine and The Scientist magazine. He earned his bachelor's degree at Oberlin College in Oberlin, Ohio in 1993.

Show Printable Version Email this Page

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Humans spur worst extinctions since dinosaurs Reuters All News 0 03-20-2006 04:40 PM
Humans spur worst extinctions since dinosaurs: UN Reuters All News 0 03-20-2006 03:53 PM


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2007 Newsback.com

Krakow hotels | Servidores dedicados | Credit Counseling | Marketing | Auto Loans| Internet Marketing